
Globe + Mail, ROB, Dec 2, 2013 Edition, Page B11
By Suzanne Vranica
Television proves its marketing appeal, even for an online generation
Well boys + girls; here’s an article that every “digital agency manager” and “digital brand manager” should tattoo to their right forearm as it reiterates what all great agency practitioners are taught, challenge, integrate into their understanding of communications and then practice + preach with religious zeal.
This argument is consistently misunderstood and misinterpreted by almost all of today’s brand managers and their well-meaning agencies for a wide variety of reasons that I won’t go into today.
The theme picture for this blog entry is a surfer riding a big wave.
When I started in advertising over 35 years ago I saw a lot of people worshipping the then big idea: a new computer program that could optimize magazine, radio or TV campaign schedule “reach or frequency” performance. (But you still had to calculate the multi-media R/f estimates manually or with a calculator).
Only a few people really understood this stuff and could use it to their advantage – like this surfer does. Others were awed by it – or drowned in the reams of data. Sound familiar?
Over the years I’ve seen many big breaks – a few great riders – and lots and lots of short-sighted victims on the agency and client sides that got sucked into the wave and lost their shirt and pants.
Watching this digital wave – that has been building for the last 15 years – I see the same pattern, except that most of those with meaningful off-line experience have moved on to make room for those new to the “digital space”. People who behave as though this is the last frontier.
The final wave.
Forget what Google wants you to believe and ask yourself (as a free independent thinker) "what will advertising in the year 2049 look like?"
In about six weeks from now your team will be heading home for the holidays. In about eight weeks they’ll pick up where they left off – heading in what they believe is the “right direction”.
And while you’ll want your brand to do better in 2014 than it did in 2013, so will every other brand manager out there.
What will you do to build brand fidelity – not just brand loyalty?
While I’m not going to attempt a summary of best practices here because the right approach for your business depends on your management style, your business category, competitive environment, brand positioning, and where your brand is on its brand life-line, here are a few things to take to heart:
Many people don’t like “working the plan”. I have two thoughts on this:
Prepare a presentation for early January 2014 that outlines the Goals, Strategies + Tactics for 2014.
Break the tactics down to the individual level to ensure each person on your team knows exactly what they need to do to help the brand make its year.
Need help with your plan or presentation? e-me at: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

This morning I heard a story on CBC that I hadn’t heard in a long time: “shop local”. Apparently Toronto merchants are banding together to encourage shoppers to shop local this Christmas. The counterpoint of this news-bite was a woman who told the reporter that she and her daughter “always go to Buffalo because there are so many more bargains”. I hear the same stupid story when I’m in Winnipeg where residents love to brag about the great deals they can get in Grand Forks.
While the "deals" are there, the only polite way I can describe this behavior is economically short-sighted. If you’re earning your money here and you’re spending your money there, who and what is supposed to pay for the infrastructure you insist on having – including state of the art health care with no waiting times and the same-old-same-old postal service standards despite the fact that you’re doing everything by e-mail and e-transfer?
Consider these facts I gathered from Wikipedia.
The service sector in Canada is vast and multifaceted, employing about three quarters of Canadians and accounting for 78% of GDP. The largest employer is the retail sector, employing almost 12% of Canadians. The retail industry is mainly concentrated in a small number of chain stores clustered together in shopping malls. In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of big-box stores, such as Wal-Mart, Future Shop, Zellers-Target and Home Depot. This has led to fewer workers in this sector and a migration of retail jobs to the suburbs.
The second largest portion of the service sector is the business services, employing only a slightly smaller percentage of the population. This includes the financial services, real estate, and communications industries. This portion of the economy has been rapidly growing in recent years. It is largely concentrated in the major urban centres, especially Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver.
This helps to explain why you'll see so many ghost-town (when driving) across Canada. Locally the big box malls bankrupt the small towns' main-streets. Regionally the larger cities attract the kids from the small towns with hope of finding a good job and an interesting future. With-in a generation all that's left is a boarded up town. Homes and businesses can’t be sold because the town’s cash flow has been siphoned off locally and regionally.
Today our unemployment rates vary from 5% in the West to 14% in the East.
If you shop local it doesn’t have to be that way.
At the local level you can buy almost anything you want or need to enjoy the good life if you give your head a little shake.
Please think about the ripple effect your behavior can have before you spend your hard-earned dollars "there".

I recently spoke to a woman here on business from Oklahoma. She was driving a Hertz rental car and immersing herself in as much Canadian culture as she could jam into her time off. So you can imagine how disappointed she was that Hertz didn't offer any “Canadian” car rentals.
I went off looking for why and found the following on CBC News Online | August 21, 2006 and Wikipedia:
The Bricklin SV-1 was a gull-wing door sports car assembled in Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada. The body panels were manufactured in a separate plant in Minto, New Brunswick. Manufactured from 1974 until early 1976 for the U.S. market, the car was the creation of Malcolm Bricklin, an American millionaire who had previously founded Subaru of America. The Bricklin factory was not able to produce vehicles fast enough to make a profit. As a result, only 2,854 cars were built before the company went into receivership, owing the New Brunswick government $23 million.
I’m thinking that the next opportunity for a Canadian car could come from India or China if these two super-powers can crack our domestic (auto) manufacturing challenge: